Cozad v. Strack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is doubtful that plaintiffs’ amended petition here is broad enough to state a claim under the doctrine applied in Schauland v. Schmaltz. We therefore give such doctrine no further consideration here.”
• “It is doubtful that plaintiffs’ amended petition here is broad enough to state a claim under the doctrine applied in Schauland v. Schmaltz. We therefore give such doctrine no further consideration here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).