Schaefer v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearsay evidence admissible if sufficiently convincing to a reasonable mind and sufficient assurance of truthfulness exists
• since the Veterans Preference Act and the Performance Rating Act provide separate means of terminating an employee, a discharge under the Veterans Preference Act need not comply with the provisions of the Performance Rating Act
• since the Veterans Preference Act and the Performance Rating Act provide separate means of terminating an employee, a discharge under the Veterans Preference Act need not comply with the provisions of the Performance Rating Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Loyce E. Hayes v. Department of the Navy
  Federal Circuit· 1984-02-09· cited 592×
• Richard L. Windsor v. The Tennessean
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-01-23· cited 368×
• Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-02-26· cited 221×
• State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1986-12-18· cited 96×
• Anthony R. Sanders v. United States Postal Service
  Federal Circuit· 1986-09-22· cited 94×
• Lukas E. Hoska, III v. United States Department of the Army
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-04-30· cited 52×
• Patton v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-03-23· cited 51×
• Claude H. Weaver v. Merit Systems Protection Board
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-03-01· cited 43×
• In Re Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-01-24· cited 39×
• Road & Highway Builders, LLC v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-20· cited 38×
• Robert L. Bradley, Jr. v. Veterans Administration
  Federal Circuit· 1990-03-30· cited 37×
• United Enterprise & Associates v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-03-21· cited 35×
• Avtel Services, Inc. v. Unites States
  Federal Claims· 2005-12-22· cited 21×
• Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-08-29· cited 20×
• New Dynamics Foundation v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-04-24· cited 16×
• J. Cooper & Associates, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-07-12· cited 14×
• Rodriguez v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-01-30· cited 14×
• KSEND v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-12-08· cited 10×
• Bannum, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-01-23· cited 10×
• Southern Comfort Builders, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-07-29· cited 9×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kalvar Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1976-10-20· cited 221×
• Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 216×
• Wathen v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1975-12-17· cited 70×
• Pascal v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1976-10-20· cited 48×
• Samuel Jacobowitz v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1970-07-15· cited 37×
• Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Robert Underwood, and Supreme Court of Illinois
  Seventh Circuit· 1976-01-23· cited 27×
• McKee v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1974-07-19· cited 27×
• Reil v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1972-03-17· cited 21×
• Charles R. Armstrong v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1969-01-24· cited 16×
• Angrisani v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1965-07-16· cited 11×
• Shapley
  Court of Claims· 1977-05-27· cited 6×
• Verrault
  Court of Claims· 1978-03-03· cited 6×
• West v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1975-07-11· cited 4×