Skip to main content
· 12/18/1986

State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Citations

  • 729 P.2d 497
  • 102 Nev. 606
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we will not reverse an administrative agency's factual finding even if \it is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence\
  • noting that the Board was free to assign probative values to testimony adduced during a hearing
  • substantial evidence is evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion
  • substantial evidence is that which “‘a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion’ ” (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.