Scarborough v. Eubanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prejudice includes “excessive and possibly irremediable burdens or costs imposed on the opposing party”
• examples of prejudice are “the irretrievable loss of evidence, the inevitable dimming of witnesses’ memories, or the excessive and possibly irremediable burdens or costs imposed on the opposing party.”
• vacating dismissal after a misapplication of two factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 4,024×
• Herrman v. Allstate Insurance
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-08-11· cited 5×
• United States v. $8,221,877.16 in United States Currency
  Third Circuit· 2003-05-28· cited 1×
• In Re: Daimler
  Third Circuit· 2007-09-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
  Third Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 2,455×
• National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 2,202×
• Louis H. GROSS, Lillian C. Gross and Marvin Kowit, Co-Partners, Trading as Gross & Kowit v. STEREO COMPONENT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
  Third Circuit· 1983-02-18· cited 244×
• Scarborough v. Eubanks
  Third Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 171×
• Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co
  Third Circuit· 1983-05-02· cited 3×