Third Circuit· 11/5/1984
Scarborough v. Eubanks
Citations
- 747 F.2d 871
- 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that, although the plaintiff’s pretrial documents were “filed inexcusably late,” it was not the same history of dilatoriness present in Poulis
- finding that, although the plaintiff’s pretrial documents were “filed inexcusably late,” it was not the same history of dilatoriness present in Poulis, 747 F.2d at 868
- offering examples of prejudice such as the “irretrievable loss of evidence, the inevitable dimming of witnesses’ memories, or the excessive and possibly irremediable burdens or costs imposed on the opposing party”
- where attorney filed all required papers, albeit some tardily, behavior was not willful or contumacious
- “As we have repeatedly stated, doubts should be resolved in favor of reaching a decision on the merits.”
- “As we have repeatedly stated, doubts should be resolved in favor of reaching a decision on the merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesNinth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 4,024×
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyThird Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 2,455×
- Budget Blinds, Inc. v. WhiteThird Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 414×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-07-15· cited 401×
- Emcasco Insurance Company v. Louis SambrickThird Circuit· 1987-11-27· cited 381×
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Third Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 236×
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgThird Circuit· 2007-09-18· cited 206×
- Bull v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Third Circuit· 2012-01-04· cited 183×
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1995-02-15· cited 177×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1988-07-01· cited 123×
- Frederick A. Carter v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterThird Circuit· 1986-11-06· cited 83×
- Tera Knoll v. City of AllentownThird Circuit· 2013-02-21· cited 82×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1989-08-17· cited 70×
- Scarborough v. EubanksThird Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 67×
- Lopez v. CousinsThird Circuit· 2011-06-23· cited 61×
- Hanley v. HanleyTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-06-28· cited 56×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RossaTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1992-04-22· cited 55×
- Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2006-12-06· cited 53×
- Ali v. SimsThird Circuit· 1986-04-21· cited 53×
- Ward v. HousmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1991-06-07· cited 45×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyThird Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 2,455×
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 2,202×
- Louis H. GROSS, Lillian C. Gross and Marvin Kowit, Co-Partners, Trading as Gross & Kowit v. STEREO COMPONENT SYSTEMS, INC., AppellantThird Circuit· 1983-02-18· cited 244×
- Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. CoThird Circuit· 1983-05-02· cited 3×
Other cases named Scarborough v. Eubanks
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.