S.C. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that nature of juvenile process is rehabilitation and aid to juvenile to direct his behavior so he will not later become a criminal
• observing that the commitment to the DOC ensured that the juvenile would receive, “in a secure environment, the extended rehabilitative counseling that she needs to address her mental health and substance abuse issues”
• noting the juvenile had been provided, among other things, inpatient and outpatient counseling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• SC v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-22
• DS v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-30
• B.W. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-10-12
• D.F. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-08-10
• P.P. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-10-10
• M.C. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-10-09
• In the Matter of T.M., Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-07
• T.C. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jordan v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-01· cited 97×
• E.H. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-03-04· cited 47×
• A.D. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-25· cited 32×
• Madaras v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-09-15· cited 26×