Skip to main content
· 9/15/1981

Madaras v. State

Citations

  • 425 N.E.2d 670
  • 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that flexibility provided by juvenile system in dealing with juvenile problems is of primary importance
  • finding clear error in juvenile court’s failure to enter required findings was “waived” where trial court did not abuse its discretion with its selection of disposition, which Madaras had already served
  • “[T]he code explicitly recognizes that in some instances commitment may be in the best interests of the child and society in general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Hoffman, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.