Sax v. Sax

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court has the sua sponte duty to condition the dismissal for conflict of interest upon the requirement that notice of the dismissal and an opportunity to intervene be given to the other stockholders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schnitzer v. O'CONNOR
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-07-07· cited 27×
• Fields v. Sax
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-12· cited 26×
• Forkin Ex Rel. Harrison Park Development, Inc. v. Cole
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-21· cited 20×
• Caulfield v. The Packer Group, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-08-29· cited 11×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Patient Care Services, S.C. v. Segal
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-10-02· cited 30×
• Lobdell v. City of Chicago
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1907-04-18· cited 27×
• Johnson v. King-Richardson Co.
  First Circuit· 1930-01-06· cited 24×
• Illinois Power Co. v. Latham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-10-30· cited 24×
• Duncan v. National Tea Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1957-10-04· cited 19×
• Goldman v. Jameson
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1973-03-22· cited 13×
• Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1963-10-29· cited 11×
• Russell v. Louis Melind Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1947-05-07· cited 5×
• Minarik v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1957-02-11· cited 4×
• Schipper v. Block & Kuhl Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1936-02-10· cited 2×