Sawyer v. White
Citations
- 122 F. 223
- 58 C.C.A. 587
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4753
Syllabus
<p>1. Conveyance—Mental Capacity of Grantor to Make.</p> <p>In determining the competency of a grantor to execute a deed, the question is not whether or not his mental powers were impaired, or whether or not he had ordinary capacity to do business when he executed it, but whether or not he had any—the smallest—capacity to understand what he was doing, and to decide intelligently whether or not he desired to do it.</p> <p>2. Gift from Parent to Child—Fiduciary Relation.</p> <p>The existence of a fiduciary relation between a parent and his child is not necessarily fatal to a deed or gift from the former to the latter, because such a deed or gift is natural and reasonable, and is sustained by the presumption that it was inspired by parental affection and devotion. This presumption overcomes the ordinary presumption that an unnatural or unreasonable gift procured through a fiduciary relation is voidable.</p> <p>8. Deed—Undue Influence.</p> <p>The undue influence which will avoid a deed is an unlawful or fraudulent influence which controls the will of the grantor. The affection, confidence, and gratitude of a parent to a child, which inspires a deed or gift, is a natural and lawful influence, and will not render it voidable, unless this influence has been so used as to confuse the judgment and control the will of the donor.</p> <p>A Same—Fiduciary Relation—Facts.</p> <p>A father 88 years of age, who had been a paralytic for 15 years, and so feeble that he had required constant attendance and assistance, had intrusted his business to his son, who had managed it for him and had supplied his wants with rare assiduity and kindness. The father had perfect confidence in this son, and was grateful to him for his kindness. For many years he had intended to give his property to him at his decease. His mind was impaired, his powers of speech and locomotion, were very limited, but he knew what he was doing; and he intentionally conveyed land worth $20,000 to this son without any ac
Judges: Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisEighth Circuit· 1904-10-24· cited 115×
- Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Eighth Circuit· 1905-08-22· cited 92×
- Brun v. MannEighth Circuit· 1906-11-07· cited 77×
- Harrison v. MoncravieEighth Circuit· 1920-03-30· cited 27×
- Rowe v. FreemanOregon Supreme Court· 1918-04-30· cited 20×
- Sun Oil Co. v. BurfordFifth Circuit· 1942-07-11· cited 19×
- United States Min. Co. v. DawsonEighth Circuit· 1904-11-23· cited 19×
- Morrill v. American Reserve Bond Co. of KentuckyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1907-01-10· cited 19×
- Amado v. AguirreArizona Supreme Court· 1945-07-09· cited 18×
- Irwin v. SimmonsSecond Circuit· 1944-01-28· cited 12×
- Jackson v. United States National Bank, Portland, Ore.D. Oregon· 1957-07-01· cited 9×
- Stump v. SturmFourth Circuit· 1918-10-01· cited 9×
- Gibson v. CollinsD.C. Circuit· 1925-01-05· cited 7×
- Ludwig v. BresslerEighth Circuit· 1918-07-25· cited 7×
- Meyer v. JacobsD. Nevada· 1903-07-06· cited 5×
- Notley v. NotleyHawaii Supreme Court· 1917-05-01· cited 4×
- Guilfoil v. HayesE.D. Virginia· 1936-04-02· cited 1×
- McDermott v. HannonW.D. New York· 1913-03-18· cited 1×
- Alcorn v. AlcornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Mississippi· 1911-12-04· cited 1×
- Sieland v. HamelE.D. Missouri· 1953-01-21· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court· 1873-04-15· cited 321×
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 272×
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court· 1876-03-20· cited 191×
- National Surety Co. v. State BankEighth Circuit· 1903-02-02· cited 139×
- Ellis v. DavisSupreme Court· 1883-12-10· cited 132×
- Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1890-03-17· cited 109×
- Cowley v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1895-11-18· cited 73×
- Darragh v. H. Wetter Manuf'g Co.Eighth Circuit· 1897-01-18· cited 50×
- McFadin v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri· 1894-02-13· cited 44×
- Richardson v. GreenNinth Circuit· 1894-04-19· cited 29×
- Mann v. Keene Guaranty Sav. Bank of KeeneEighth Circuit· 1898-03-21· cited 22×
- In re Stutsman CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota· 1898-06-24· cited 21×
- Brodhead v. ShoemakerU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia· 1890-12-26· cited 8×
Other cases named Sawyer v. White
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.