Skip to main content
D. New Mexico· 3/8/2012

Sawyer v. USAA Insurance

Citations

  • 839 F. Supp. 2d 1189
  • 2012 WL 843639
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “court may deny a motion in limine when it lacks the necessary specificity”
  • explaining that “court may deny a motion in limine when it lacks the necessary specificity with respect to the evidence to be excluded.”
  • noting that evidentiary rulings, especially those that encompass broad classes of evidence, should generally be deferred until trial to allow for the resolution of questions of foundation, relevancy, and potential prejudice in proper context
  • noting that evidentiary rulings, especially those that encompass broad classes of evidence, should generally be deferred until trial to allow for the resolution of questions of foundation, relevancy, and potential prejudice in proper context
  • noting that evidentiary rulings, especially those that encompass broad classes of evidence, should generally be deferred until trial to allow for the resolution of questions of foundation, relevancy, and potential prejudice in proper context
  • noting that evidentiary rulings, especially those that encompass broad classes of evidence, should generally be deferred until trial to allow for the resolution of questions of foundation, relevancy, and potential prejudice in proper context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.