Savant Homes, Inc. v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment decision concluding that floor plan did not include any protected elements or arrangement of elements
• “Because Savant failed to raise a fact issue as to inherent distinctiveness or secondary meaning, it failed to satisfy its summary judgment burden on its trade dress claim.”
• “The parties do not dispute that Savant owns a valid copyright . . . .”
• “Sales volume ... only suggests secondary meaning when presented in conjunction with other evidence; standing alone, sales volume may not be indicative of secondary meaning because it could be related to factors other than source identification.” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).