Skip to main content
· 9/3/2002

Sally Beauty Company v. Beautyco Inc.

Citations

  • 304 F.3d 964
  • 64 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18139
  • 2002 WL 2005902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court “resolves factual disputes” when evaluating a factual attack on subject matter jurisdiction
  • explaining that in a word mark, “no one word takes precedence over the others”
  • explaining that in a word mark; \no one word takes precedence over the others\
  • listing factors for determining likelihood of confusion in trademark infringement claims and stating the factors “apply equally to trade dress infringement claims”
  • explaining “items purchased on impulse are more likely to be confused than expensive items, which are typically chosen carefully”
  • giving “cola” as an example of a general class of goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, McKAY, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.