Supreme Court of Arkansas· 7/7/1986
Satterlee v. State
Citations
- 289 Ark. 450
- 711 S.W.2d 827
- 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider a pro se appellant’s arguments that were incomprehensible and lacking in authority or convincing argument.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hickman, Newbern, Rule, Rules, Supreme, Would
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Howard v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-04-27· cited 6×
- Alexander v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas· 2017-04-13· cited 3×
- Jones v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-09-27· cited 3×
- Mincy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1986-10-08· cited 1×
- Opinion No.Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1988-04-01
- Opinion No.Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1988-11-29
- Zayzhon Thompson v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2023-11-15
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 750×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-01-10· cited 196×
- Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-10-22· cited 77×
- City of Miami v. AronovitzSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-09-16· cited 58×
- City of Cincinnati v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 1945-10-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.