Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/7/2020
Satiro, F. v. Maninno, A.
Citations
- 237 A.3d 1145
- 2020 Pa. Super. 185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the appellant waived his appellate issues where he raised 29 issues in his concise statement
- “Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) is not satisfied by simply filing any statement. Rather, the statement must … permit the trial court to understand the specific issues being raised on appeal.
- “In a Per Curiam Order. . . this Court directed Appellant to praecipe the trial court prothonotary to enter judgment on the decision of the trial court to avoid quashal of his appeal.”
- “Our law makes it clear that Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) is not satisfied by simply filing any statement. Rather, the statement must … permit the trial court to understand the specific issues being raised on appeal.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-01· cited 374×
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-12· cited 362×
- Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-23· cited 246×
- Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-10· cited 198×
- Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-18· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-11-18· cited 135×
- Tucker v. R.M. ToursSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-28· cited 126×
- Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-08· cited 122×
- O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-14· cited 102×
- Riley v. FoleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-09-10· cited 63×
- Spector Gadon & Rosen, P. C. v. KanterSupreme Court· 2006-01-09· cited 28×
- Satiro, F. v. Maninno, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-08-07· cited 2×
Other cases named Satiro, F. v. Maninno, A.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.