Skip to main content
· 9/10/2001

Riley v. Foley

Citations

  • 783 A.2d 807
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 266
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 1925 is a crucial component of the appellate process because it allows the trial court to identify and focus on those issues the parties plan to raise on appeal
  • Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306, 308 (Pa. 1999) and its progeny applied to family law case involving child support and issue asserted on appeal was waived due to mother’s failure to include it in Rule 1925(b) statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Stevens, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.