Second Circuit· 10/4/1984
Satchell v. Dilworth
Citations
- 745 F.2d 781
- 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 176
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17946
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A pro se plaintiff who brings a civil rights action should be ‘fairly freely’ afforded an opportunity to amend his complaint.”
- “Failure to plead an affirmative defense in the answer results in the waiver of that defense and its exclusion from the case.” (internal quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matima v. CelliSecond Circuit· 2000-09-18· cited 252×
- Sompo Japan Insurance Co. of America v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Second Circuit· 2014-08-06· cited 101×
- Dluhos v. Floating & Abandoned Vessel, Known as \New York\Second Circuit· 1998-11-20· cited 53×
- Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-11-09· cited 44×
- Bradley v. RamseyW.D. North Carolina· 2004-03-25· cited 32×
- Richard v. FischerW.D. New York· 2014-08-07· cited 30×
- Bobal v. Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteSecond Circuit· 1990-10-22· cited 28×
- Barnes v. County of MonroeW.D. New York· 2015-02-10· cited 27×
- Perez v. PonteE.D. New York· 2017-02-14· cited 25×
- Dudek v. Nassau County Sheriff's DepartmentE.D. New York· 2013-11-19· cited 23×
- Martin J. Sawma v. Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Social ServicesSecond Circuit· 1990-02-01· cited 16×
- Morales v. FischerW.D. New York· 2014-09-22· cited 15×
- Brooks v. PrackW.D. New York· 2014-12-31· cited 15×
- Roniger v. McCallS.D. New York· 1998-09-15· cited 13×
- Signature Apparel Group LLC v. Laurita (In re Signature Apparel Group LLC)S.D. New York· 2017-08-24· cited 9×
- Webster v. HimmelbachW.D. New York· 2017-09-27· cited 8×
- Husowitz v. RunyonE.D. New York· 1996-10-15· cited 7×
- Tufano v. One Toms Point Lane Corp.E.D. New York· 1999-09-13· cited 7×
- DeJesus v. BradtW.D. New York· 2016-03-31· cited 7×
- Lopez v. WardS.D. New York· 1988-02-26· cited 6×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court· 1967-04-11· cited 4,282×
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court· 1972-03-20· cited 2,756×
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 2,697×
- Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenFourth Circuit· 1978-05-02· cited 1,807×
- Gillespie v. CivilettiNinth Circuit· 1980-10-06· cited 948×
- Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court· 1978-11-13· cited 239×
- Tyrone H. Maggette v. Stephen DalsheimSecond Circuit· 1983-06-10· cited 99×
- Dennis and Rose Verhein v. South Bend Lathe, Inc. And Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co.Seventh Circuit· 1979-04-24· cited 82×
- Jerome R. MacLin v. Deputy Sheriff PaulsonSeventh Circuit· 1980-08-07· cited 79×
- Jackson M. Troxler v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. National Service Industries, Inc., D/B/A North Bros. Co., Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1983-10-17· cited 70×
- Satchell v. DilworthSecond Circuit· 1984-10-04· cited 67×
- Lloyd L. Downing, M. D. v. R. Allen Williams, SuperintendentFifth Circuit· 1980-08-21· cited 51×
- Pinto Trucking Service, Inc. v. Motor Dispatch, Inc., and Harry NewbergerSeventh Circuit· 1981-07-21· cited 42×
- Lloyd L. Downing, M. D. v. R. Allen Williams, SuperintendentFifth Circuit· 1981-05-28· cited 34×
- Victor Bayron v. Correctional Officer Trudeau and Correctional Counselor G. Petrushun, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesSecond Circuit· 1983-02-25· cited 30×
- Joseph C. Myers v. John Deere Limited, a Canadian CorporationEighth Circuit· 1982-07-23· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.