Second Circuit· 8/13/1992
Sassower v. Field
Citations
- 973 F.2d 75
- 1992 WL 194514
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court has inherent authority to impose attorney’s fees on pro se litigant acting in bad faith or for oppressive reasons
- holding that § 1927 cannot be used to impose sanctions on non-lawyer litigants, but also holding that § 1927 can impose sanctions on a pro se litigant who is also a lawyer
- finding that § 1927 cannot be applied to non-lawyer pro se litigants because they do not fall within the meaning of “admitted” in the statute
- finding that defendants could not make a showing that the suit was “frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation” when the district judge already recognized that it pled a prima facie case of discrimination and presented a factual dispute for the jury”
- affirming financial sanction on pro se plaintiff for vexatious litigation conduct pursuant to district court’s inherent sanction authority
- finding an award of attorney’s fees as sanctions against a pro se plaintiff was appropriate where the plaintiff had repeatedly utilized “entirely vexatious and oppressive tactics”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jon, Lumbard, Newman, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carr v. TillerySeventh Circuit· 2010-01-12· cited 160×
- Anthony Alexander v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 150×
- In Re: Rimsat, Limited, Debtor, Appeals Of: Kauthar Sdn BhdSeventh Circuit· 2000-05-18· cited 85×
- Yeheskel Dattner v. Conagra Foods, Inc., Conagra International, Inc., Donald Da Parma, Docket No. 05-5568-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-07-27· cited 82×
- Sassower v. FieldSecond Circuit· 1992-08-13· cited 49×
- Sassower v. AbramsS.D. New York· 1993-09-08· cited 47×
- Trigon Insurance v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 2001-11-09· cited 43×
- Sorenson v. WolfsonS.D. New York· 2016-03-21· cited 35×
- DLC Management Corp. v. Town of Hyde ParkSecond Circuit· 1998-12-15· cited 33×
- American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio (Afscme) v. Nassau CountySecond Circuit· 1996-09-26· cited 27×
- Wentworth v. HedsonE.D. New York· 2007-06-26· cited 27×
- Bowler v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceS.D. New York· 1995-09-12· cited 25×
- LCS Grp. LLC v. Shire LLCS.D. Illinois· 2019-05-29· cited 16×
- 680 Fifth Avenue Associates v. EGI Co. Services (In Re 680 Fifth Avenue Associates)S.D. New York· 1998-02-20· cited 13×
- Crenshaw v. City of Defuniak SpringsN.D. Florida· 1995-05-12· cited 13×
- Hall v. DworkinN.D. New York· 1993-07-28· cited 13×
- Marine Midland Bank v. Huber (In Re Huber)W.D. New York· 1994-07-01· cited 12×
- Mohamed v. McLaurinD. Vermont· 2019-05-30· cited 12×
- Institute for Motivational Living, Inc. v. Doulos Institute for Strategic Consulting, Inc.Third Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 11×
- Balcar v. BELL AND ASSOCIATES, LLCN.D. West Virginia· 2003-04-04· cited 9×
Other cases named Sassower v. Field
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.