Supreme Court of Arkansas· 7/8/1999
Sasser v. State
Citations
- 993 S.W.2d 901
- 338 Ark. 375
- 1999 Ark. LEXIS 379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the omission of the actus reus element from the instructions for attempted rape and attempted kidnapping was not a structural error
- stating that even constitutional issues must be raised in the trial court and on direct appeal, rather than in Rule 37 proceedings
- stating that even constitutional issues must be raised in the circuit court and on direct appeal rather than in Rule 37 proceedings
- “[T]here is ample evidence in the record to support a finding of either kidnapping, attempted kidnapping, or attempted rape as the underlying felony for the capital murder charge.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-06-29· cited 177×
- Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-22· cited 164×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-29· cited 111×
- Andrew Sasser v. Ray HobbsEighth Circuit· 2013-11-15· cited 80×
- Camargo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-09-27· cited 55×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-11-03· cited 48×
- Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-09-14· cited 47×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-05-31· cited 46×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-02-22· cited 39×
- Sasser v. NorrisEighth Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 35×
- Cothren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-05-10· cited 29×
- Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 28×
- Houghton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-06-04· cited 26×
- Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Greene County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-07· cited 25×
- Eric Randall Nance v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionEighth Circuit· 2004-12-10· cited 21×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-14· cited 21×
- State v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-11-29· cited 21×
- Arroyo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-06-06· cited 20×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-11-21· cited 18×
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-05-25· cited 13×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- California v. RoySupreme Court· 1996-11-04· cited 374×
- United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles PattersonSeventh Circuit· 1985-12-04· cited 99×
- United States v. RandazzoFirst Circuit· 1996-04-08· cited 80×
- Sasser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-07-17· cited 60×
- Neff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-09-30· cited 43×
- Hulsey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-03-31· cited 39×
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-05-06· cited 35×
- Abbott v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1987-03-24· cited 32×
- Finley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-05-02· cited 32×
- Catlett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-01-29· cited 24×
- Thrash v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-03-30· cited 23×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-12-09· cited 21×
- Easley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-09-15· cited 20×
- United States v. Charles KingSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-21· cited 12×
- Pitcock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-05-02· cited 10×
- Cohen v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 1998-03-31· cited 10×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-07-16· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.