United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evidence of a prior conspiracy was not too remote because it ended shortly before a second conspiracy began
• the defendant’s specific intent to distribute was an essential element of the crime of conspiracy to distribute more than 1,000 pounds of marijuana
• the defendant's specific intent to distribute was an essential element of the crime of conspiracy to distribute more than 1,000 pounds of marijuana
• appellate court should not substitute its own determination of credibility for that of the trier-of-fact which had an opportunity to observe firsthand the conflicting testimony and demeanor of witnesses
• trial court correctly sustained objection to admission of prior statement when government did not confront witness with it
• trial court correctly sustained objection to admission of prior statement when government did not confront witness with it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).