Sarviss v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that certain California wage orders did not apply to a California resident because he did not principally work in California
• noting that the focus on situs of employment as opposed to residence of the employee is , consistent with the decisions of California state courts
• “There is no ‘clear expression]’ of extraterritorial application for California wage and hour laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).