Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 4/8/1993
Sargent v. Sargent
Citations
- 622 A.2d 721
- 1993 Me. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the complaint did not facially reveal that it was barred as a matter of law
- former wife could maintain separate plenary action against ex-husband for fraud and misrepresentation as to value of marital estate
- former wife could maintain separate plenary action against ex-husband for fraud and misrepresentation as to value of marital estate
- substance of extrinsic material that is included within a pleading may be considered for purposes of a rule 12 motion to dismiss
- \ARule 12(b)(6) motion is appropriate to raise the affirmative defense of res judicata only if the facts establishing the defense appear on the face of the complaint.\
- \A Rule 12(b)(6) motion is appropriate to raise the affirmative defense of res judicata only if the facts establishing the defense appear on the face of the complaint.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sargent v. BuckleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-07-21· cited 26×
- Gray v. TD Bank, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-06-26· cited 21×
- Salenius v. SaleniusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-02-09· cited 20×
- Webb v. HaasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-10-10· cited 16×
- Kolmosky v. KolmoskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-09-20· cited 14×
- Sargent v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-03-12· cited 5×
- Telerent Leasing Corp. v. Pine State Plumbing & Heating, Inc.D. Maine· 2002-11-11· cited 3×
- Sargent v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-06-06· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. First National Bank of BostonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-04-22· cited 102×
- Letellier v. SmallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-04-19· cited 81×
- Currier v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-09-08· cited 69×
- Chiapetta v. Clark AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-02-25· cited 48×
- Kradoska v. KippSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-01-29· cited 48×
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1972-04-24· cited 33×
- Butler v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-10-23· cited 27×
- Estate of WhitlockSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-11-12· cited 19×
- Patten v. MilamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-12-12· cited 16×
- Nobel v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-12-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.