Kradoska v. Kipp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding if plaintiffs was aware of fraud at the time of the first action, then she could have and should have raised the claim
• “Judicial economy, fairness to litigants, and the strong public interest favoring finality in judicial proceedings”
• “[A] plaintiff seeking legal relief must plead all theories of recovery then available to him.”
• “Judicial economy, fairness to litigants, and the strong public interest favoring finality in judicial proceedings demand that a plaintiff present all relevant aspects of his cause of action in a single lawsuit.”
• res judicata applied to state-court judgment following adversarial participation by both parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).