District of Columbia· 9/5/2014
Sarceno v. Choi
Citations
- 66 F. Supp. 3d 157
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123926
- 2014 WL 4380680
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that- the FBI .improperly withheld information under Exemption 7(D) under an implied assurance of confidentiality
- denying motions for summary judgment without considering relationship between the FLSA and the DC- MWA claims
- “The totality of circumstances approach examines three primary aspects of the agreements to evaluate their fairness and reasonableness: (1) whether the employer is 'overreaching' to secure a waiver of rights; (2
- \typical tenets of contract law do not apply to FLSA settlements\
- “typical tenets of contract law do not apply to FLSA settlements”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc.Second Circuit· 2019-12-06· cited 252×
- Kraus v. Pa Fit II, LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-01-11· cited 67×
- Sarceno v. ChoiDistrict of Columbia· 2015-01-29· cited 13×
- Hernandez v. StringerDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-29· cited 11×
- Abrego v. Yu Lin, Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-07-09· cited 2×
- Dinkel v. Medstar Health Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-09-01
- Canning v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-13
- Abrego v. Yu Lin, CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2018-07-09
- Seo v. OhDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-23
- Lucas v. GuzmanDistrict of Columbia· 2022-06-08
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-04-06· cited 1,393×
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 1,263×
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayD.C. Circuit· 1993-11-26· cited 539×
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2002-06-18· cited 505×
- Lliguichuzhca v. Cinema 60, LLCS.D. New York· 2013-06-05· cited 254×
- Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States ex rel. U. S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Wage & Hour DivisionEleventh Circuit· 1982-07-06· cited 189×
- Pardo-Kronemann v. DonovanD.C. Circuit· 2010-04-16· cited 184×
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 176×
- Dees v. Hydradry, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2010-04-19· cited 170×
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2011-03-08· cited 169×
- Veitch, D. Philip v. England, Gordon R.D.C. Circuit· 2006-11-28· cited 141×
- Martin v. Spring Break '83 Productions, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2012-07-24· cited 134×
- Duprey v. Scotts Co.D. Maryland· 2014-05-23· cited 127×
- Colbert, Venita v. Potter, John E.D.C. Circuit· 2006-12-15· cited 126×
- Tele-Communications of Key West, Inc. v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1985-04-02· cited 95×
- Candace Nall v. Mal-Motels, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2013-07-29· cited 83×
- Flynn v. Tiede-Zoeller, Inc.District of Columbia· 2006-01-24· cited 51×
- Azcao Carrillo v. Dandan, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-06-26· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.