Skip to main content
· 6/26/2014

Azcao Carrillo v. Dandan, Inc.

Citations

  • 51 F. Supp. 3d 124
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to approve all terms of FLSA settlement agreement, including clauses directing plaintiffs to “stay away” from defendants, as well as requiring the signing of a release
  • “The D.C. Circuit has not opined about whether judicial approval is required of FLSA settlements reached after an FLSA suit has been filed or the related issue of whether such approval is a prerequisite for subsequent judicial enforcement of a private settlement.”
  • “If the parties privately settle FLSA claims and seek dismissal of the suit by filing a Rule 41 motion, the private settlement may be unenforceable if the employer attempts to enforce the employees’ waiver of claims per the settlement at a later date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.