Santana v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he general rule is that exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense . . . .”
• “[T]he general rule is that exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense . . . .” (citing Sylvia H. Walbolt, Matthew J. Conigliaro & J. Andrew Meyer, Fla. Civ. Prac. Before Trial, § 25.34 at 25–30 (7th ed. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).