· 5/6/1999
Harvard v. Singletary
Citations
- 733 So. 2d 1020
- 1999 WL 278109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- writ petitions that could require resolution of disputed issues of fact should be handled by the circuit courts
- “In the past, this Court has declined to exercise its jurisdiction over extraordinary writ petitions raising substantial issues of fact and has dismissed without prejudice or transferred such cases to the appropriate circuit court.”
- al leged misassignment to particular correctional institution
- alleged misassignment to particular correctional institution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.