Skip to main content
· 3/13/2002

Sansone v. Morton MacHine Works, Inc.

Citations

  • 188 F. Supp. 2d 182
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4415
  • 2002 WL 407622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where one defendant represented consent on behalf of a co-defendant, and the co-defendant consented directly to the court only after the removal period was over, the removal was defective and remand was appropriate
  • collecting cases where oral consent before the court was sufficient to meet the unanimity requirement
  • reviewing diverse holdings as to how defendants establish consent to removal
  • in a multi-defendant case, all defendants must consent to removal within the 30-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torres

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.