Skip to main content

Sanford v. State

Citations

  • 695 S.E.2d 579
  • 287 Ga. 351
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1625
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “only a statement that is testimonial will cause the declarant to be a witness for the purpose of the Confrontation Clause”
  • stating “there is no requirement that the trial court have an on-the- record colloquy with a non-testifying defendant in order to inform the defendant of the right to testify and to obtain a knowing and intelligent waiver of that right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.