State v. Nejad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the burden is on the party which contends the transcript does not fully disclose what transpired at trial to have the record completed at the trial court pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41 (f
• presiding judge at trial recused from the case and a different judge heard the motion to supplement and issued a ruling thereon
• reversing Court of Appeals's determination that trial counsel had been ineffective in failing to adequately explain a defendant's right to testify
• presiding judge at trial recused from the case and a different judge heard the motion to supplement and issued a ruling thereon
• involving the omission from the trial transcript of the trial judge’s informing Nejad of his right to testify and Nejad’s indication that his decision not to testify was made after consultation with counsel
• involving the omission from the trial transcript of the trial judge’s informing Nejad of his right to testify and Nejad’s indication that his decision not to testify was made after consultation with counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).