Sandy Point Improvement Co. v. Huber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that structure on one lot could not be \appurtenant\ to structure on an adjoining lot
• stating that structure on one lot could not be “appurtenant” to structure on an adjoining lot
• “Restrictive covenants upon the use of real property will not be extended beyond the clear meaning of the language used.”
• developer and one resident as parties; court found no abandonment
• two violations in 1000-lot development did not constitute abandonment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).