Skip to main content
· 5/25/1983

White v. Wilhelm

Citations

  • 665 P.2d 407
  • 34 Wash. App. 763
  • 1983 Wash. App. LEXIS 2441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff limited only to attorney fees incurred in pretrial efforts to dissolve injunction, court did not address issue of whether right to attorney fees were included in covenant running with the land
  • “Applicability of [the abandonment] doctrine, which is based on estoppel, is a factual determination.”
  • “Applicability of [the abandonment] doctrine, which is based on estoppel, is a factual determination.”
  • “Applicability of [the abandonment] doctrine, which is based on estoppel, is a factual determination.”
  • “Applicability of [the abandonment] doctrine, which is based on estoppel, is a factual determination.”
  • attorney fees awarded though plaintiffs failed to post bond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callow, Swanson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.