Sandra Babcock v. Butler County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the FLSA, employees were not entitled to compensation during meal breaks where employees—rather than their employer—“receive[d] the predominant benefit of the time in question”
• noting that 29 C.F.R. § 785.15 and the associated regulations are interpretive regulations
• “this Court finds that deciding the Motion to Dismiss prior to the Motion for Conditional Class Certification is both judicially fair and efficient.”
• employer did not violate FLSA by not paying their employees for part of break where employees must stay in uniform, remain in close proximity to emergency response equipment, remain on call to respond to emergencies, and must stay on-campus unless given permission to leave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).