Skip to main content
· 3/30/1995

Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 651 N.E.2d 1071
  • 166 Ill. 2d 48
  • 209 Ill. Dec. 623
  • 1995 Ill. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a circuit court’s dismissal with prejudice of a complaint for the plaintiffs repeated failure to follow court orders regarding proper pleading
  • finding no abuse of discretion when the complaint was dismissed with prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to meet deadlines for amended pleadings and insistence on repleading allegations stricken from prior pleadings
  • regarding sanctions under a court’s inherent power to control its docket
  • it is well established that circuit courts possess the inherent authority to control their docket
  • the trial court had au­thority to sanction party per Rule 219(c) for vio­lation of discovery rules and for violation of trial court's orders
  • “purpose of imposing sanctions is to coerce compliance with court rules and orders, not to punish the dilatory party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMORROW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.