Farrokh Yassan v. J.P. Morgan Chase

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when movant sought dismissal under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), it was error for the district court to dismiss under 12(b)(6) without assessing the 12(b)(1) challenge
• finding that when movant sought dismissal under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), it was error for the district court to dismiss under 12(b)(6) without assessing the 12(b)(1) challenge
• finding that when movant sought dismissal under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), it was error for the district court to dismiss under 12(b)(6) without assessing the 12(b)(1) challenge
• finding that when movant sought dismissal under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), it was error for the district court to dismiss under 12(b)(6) without assessing the 12(b)(1) challenge
• noting that “[d]ismissing a case on the basis of an affirmative defense is properly done under Rule 12(c), not Rule 12(b)(6),” but affirming the district court’s dismissal “under the wrong rule”
• “Dismissing a case on the basis of an affirmative defense is properly done under Rule 12(c) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).