Skip to main content
· 12/18/2014

Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey

Citations

  • 775 F.3d 170
  • 2014 WL 7210989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that court’s review is limited to issues raised in informal brief
  • noting importance of Rule 34(b) and reiterating that our review is limited to issues preserved in informal brief
  • “The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, Wynn, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.