Devin Copeland v. Justin Bieber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• authorizing consideration of documents not attached to the complaint when they are “integral to” the allegations and authenticity is not challenged
• “[A] district court may grant a motion to dismiss or summary judgment under the extrinsic prong alone.”
• on appeal of dismissal, listening to four songs at issue in copyright infringement suit “because all were integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint”
• “To establish a claim for copyright infringement . . . a plaintiff must prove that it possesses a valid copyright and that the defendant copied elements of its work that are original and protectable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).