Samuel David Crowe v. Hilton Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Brady claim because, although defendant “argue[d] that the alleged Brady evidence would have impeached the sheriff’s testimony about the third confession, [] that testimony was largely consistent with the contents of the reports”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).