Willie McNair v. Donal Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presumption of prejudice was rebutted in part because “the state offered overwhelming and largely uncontested evidence of ... guilt”
• holding that presumption of prejudice was rebutted in part because “the state offered overwhelming and largely uncontested evidence of . . . guilt”
• concluding that introduc- tion of Bible into jury room gives rise to presumption of prejudice
• holding that presumption of prejudice was rebutted in part because “the state offered overwhelming and largely uncontested evidence of . . . guilt”
• holding that a petitioner’s citation to a single federal district court decision and a passing reference to constitutional amendments were insufficient to satisfy the exhaustion requirement
• holding that a petitioner must “present[] his claims to the state court such that a reasonable reader would understand each claim’s particular legal basis and specific factual foundation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).