Skip to main content

Sams v. Sams

Citations

  • 808 A.2d 206
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 300
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding child support agreement failed as a matter of public policy because a parent cannot bargain away his or her children’s right to support
  • indicating a party ratifies a contract by accepting benefits, remaining silent, or acquiescing when party has an opportunity to void the contract
  • “Pennsylvania law permits support orders and private agreements for support to coexist and be enforced separately”
  • “[T]he agreement [is] invalid on public policy grounds, because Mother had no power to bargain away her children’s right to support by reducing Father’s obligation from $3,400/month support to $1,000/month.”
  • “[T]he agreement [is] invalid on public policy grounds, because Mother had no power to bargain away her children’s right to support by reducing Father’s obligation from $3,400/month support to $1,000/month.”
  • “[T]he agreement [is] invalid on public policy grounds, because Mother had no power to bargain away her children’s right to support by reducing Father’s obligation from $3,400/month support to $1,000/month.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Todd, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.