Sampson v. Grooms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although ‘Ta]n easement for a private road” was “specific in its terms,” the easement still could not be used so as to “unreasonably burden the servient tenement”
• “The subject easement must be used only for purposes that do not unreasonably burden the servient tenement and which do not interfere with the use and right reserved to the dominant tenement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).