Sampson v. Grooms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although ‘Ta]n easement for a private road” was “specific in its terms,” the easement still could not be used so as to “unreasonably burden the servient tenement”
• “The subject easement must be used only for purposes that do not unreasonably burden the servient tenement and which do not interfere with the use and right reserved to the dominant tenement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shammel v. Canyon Resources Corp.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-12-24· cited 72×
• Mattson v. Montana Power Co.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 43×
• Ruana v. Grigonis
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 26×
• Mattson v. Montana Power Co.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2012-12-27· cited 26×
• Strahan v. Bush
  Montana Supreme Court· 1989-05-03· cited 25×
• Hagener v. Wallace
  Montana Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 23×
• Jarrett v. Valley Park, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-07-25· cited 21×
• Mason v. Garrison
  Montana Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 21×
• Earl v. Pavex, Corp.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2013-11-12· cited 17×
• David W. v. Paramount Homes, LLC
  Montana Supreme Court· 2011-05-24· cited 13×
• Bardos Revocable Trust v. Spoklie
  Montana Supreme Court· 2024-11-19· cited 2×
• Earl v. Pavex
  Montana Supreme Court· 2013-11-12· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Missoula v. Mix
  Montana Supreme Court· 1950-01-19· cited 42×
• Madison Fork Ranch v. L & B Lodge Pole Timber Products
  Montana Supreme Court· 1980-08-25· cited 22×
• Titeca v. State Ex Rel. Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-09-15· cited 22×
• Garrett v. Jackson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-10-09· cited 10×