Montana Supreme Court· 5/24/2011
David W. v. Paramount Homes, LLC
Citations
- 2011 MT 112
- 253 P.3d 903
- 360 Mont. 421
- 2011 Mont. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A determination of the prevailing party requires consideration of all the facts and circumstances of a case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mike McGrath
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 27×
- Wittich Law Firm, P.C. v. O'ConnellMontana Supreme Court· 2013-05-07· cited 14×
- Estate of Donald v. Kalispell Regional Medical CenterMontana Supreme Court· 2011-07-14· cited 14×
- Kenyon-Noble Lumber Co. v. Dependant Foundations, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 2018-12-18· cited 7×
- Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-07-24· cited 7×
- Heringer v. BarnegatMontana Supreme Court· 2021-04-27· cited 4×
- Beaver v. BurseyMontana Supreme Court· 2017-03-07
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-02-19· cited 48×
- Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court· 2007-07-11· cited 38×
- Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 29×
- Herren v. PettengillSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-11-13· cited 29×
- R.C.R., Inc. v. Rainbow Canyon, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-04-27· cited 28×
- MacMeekin v. Low Income Housing Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-15· cited 28×
- Leisz v. Avista Corp.Montana Supreme Court· 2007-12-18· cited 26×
- Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court· 2010-07-28· cited 26×
- Sweezey v. NeelSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-05-05· cited 26×
- Tungsten Holdings, Inc. v. KimberlinMontana Supreme Court· 2000-01-31· cited 23×
- Parker v. ElderMontana Supreme Court· 1988-07-21· cited 22×
- Stamatis v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court· 1950-11-20· cited 20×
- Boyne USA, Inc. v. Lone Moose Meadows, LLCMontana Supreme Court· 2010-06-09· cited 19×
- Sampson v. GroomsMontana Supreme Court· 1988-01-19· cited 16×
- McPherson v. MoneganMontana Supreme Court· 1947-12-15· cited 16×
- In Re the Marriage of SzafrykMontana Supreme Court· 2010-04-27· cited 14×
- Doig v. CascaddanMontana Supreme Court· 1997-03-25· cited 13×
- Omimex Canada, Ltd. v. State, Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court· 2008-12-02· cited 12×
- Glenn v. GrosfieldMontana Supreme Court· 1995-11-21· cited 9×
- Whipps, L.L.C. v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, P.C.Montana Supreme Court· 2007-03-13· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.