Sample v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Eley v. State, 288 Md. 548 [419 A.2d 384] (1980
• When “the State has failed to utilize a well-known, readily available, and superior method of proof to link the defendant with the criminal activity, the defendant ought to be able to comment on the absence of such evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stabb v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-22· cited 50×
• Atkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-08-18· cited 31×
• United States v. John Hoffman, A/K/A John Joseph, United States of America v. Bertsfield Smithen
  D.C. Circuit· 1992-05-29· cited 29×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-01· cited 20×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-27· cited 13×
• Carrero-Vasquez v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-21· cited 11×
• Samba v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-28· cited 5×
• State v. Camirand
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 2×