Skip to main content
· 9/19/1989

Salinas v. Chicago Park District

Citations

  • 545 N.E.2d 184
  • 189 Ill. App. 3d 55
  • 136 Ill. Dec. 660
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that there is no duty to a child where children of a similar age can appreciate the danger
  • explaining that there is no duty to a child where children of a similar age can appreciate the danger
  • explaining that there is no duty to a child where children of a similar age can appreciate the danger
  • determining there was no duty even where a slide is allegedly defective
  • upholding summary judgment for lack of duty in case of supervised child
  • “duty to supervise *** child as to obvious risks lies primarily with the accompanying parent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiVITO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.