Skip to main content
· 6/15/1990

Foremost-Mckesson, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran

Citations

  • 905 F.2d 438
  • 284 U.S. App. D.C. 333
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9604
  • 1990 WL 80407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a foreign state is responsible for the actions of a commercial entity if it \exercise[s] the necessary degree of control over [it] to create a principal/agent relationship\
  • holding that a foreign state is responsible for the actions of a commercial entity if it “exercise[s] the necessary degree of control over [it] to create a prineipal/agent relationship”
  • holding that defendant waived a constitutional objection to personal jurisdiction where it raised only a statutory objection before the district court
  • holding that a district court must consider whether a foreign state “so dominated the operations of the” corporate entity that a principal-agent relationship existed
  • holding that a sovereign has impliedly waived its immunity when it makes a “conscious decision to take part in the litigation and [fails] to raise sovereign immunity despite the opportunity to do so”
  • observing that sovereign immunity confers not merely a defense against liability but a right not to be tried

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Robinson, Revercomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.