Sai Feng Lin v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that constructively fraudulent transfer claims are subject to the pleading standard of Rule 8(a) (2) rather than Rule 9
• holding that the court requires the trustee, inter alia, to identify the particular debtor making the preferential transfer when there are multiple debtors involved in the case
• observing that reasonably equivalent value is usually a factual issue best left for decision after discovery is concluded
• holding “[t]he presence or absence of any single badge of 17 fraud is not conclusive”
• dismissing 15 actual and constructive fraudulent transfer claims where complaint based on “theory of 16 collective responsibility” lacked “specific allegations” of wrongdoing by “particular” 17 defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).