Sahlie v. Nolen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dicta that, should it become evident that the plan administrator acted under a conflict of interest, the administrator’s factual determinations would be reviewed under the same heightened arbitrary-and-capricious standard applicable to the administrator’s plan interpretation
• requiring a $1,500 “contempt bond” because of many frivolous and vulgar motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).