Skip to main content

Saffold v. State

Citations

  • 938 N.E.2d 837
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2381
  • 2010 WL 5133554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of handgun into evidence; officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct second pat down because officer discovered ammunition on Saffold’s person during first pat down
  • rejecting the State’s argument that the discovery of ammunition in the defendant’s car gave rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity because “something Saffold could presumably possess legally” does not “heighten suspicion something illegal was afoot”
  • second safety-frisk warranted when ammunition was discovered in individual’s vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.