Oliver Furnell Clemmons v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court was “without authority” under § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to reduce a prison term the defendant had already completely served
• rejecting the view that, for purposes of sentencing reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), § 3584(c) replaces separate consecutive charges with aggregate terms; § 3584(c
• reviewing the denial of a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion
• finding moot a motion made under § 3582(c)(2) to reduce a sentence that had already been served where inmate remained imprisoned due to later consecutive sentences imposed for offenses committed while serving original sentence
• describing “computing inmates’ credit for time served” as the BOP’s administrative duty
• describing “computing inmates’ credit for time served” as the BOP’s administrative duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).