Saffold v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a rule 3.853 motion that does not contain at least some information as to the primary evidence against the movant and any defense employed at trial, does not provide a facially sufficient statement to meet the requirements of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(4
• discussing the require-mente for a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scarborough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 4×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-05· cited 2×
• Cherryhomes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-17· cited 2×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-22· cited 2×
• Burgess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-14· cited 1×
• Vargas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-09· cited 1×
• Caba v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-14
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-12
• McClinton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zollman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-10· cited 23×
• Marsh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-03· cited 4×