Marsh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DNA testing of rape kit would be superfluous because the defendant's unsuccessful defense at trial was consensual sex and not identity
• holding that movant was not entitled to DNA testing where defense at trial had been one of consensual sex, not identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-01-29· cited 43×
• Graham v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-06-24· cited 11×
• Saffold v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-11· cited 10×
• Jefferson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Galloway v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 25×
• Hartline v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-01· cited 10×